You are browsing the archive for war - HSN.

Avatar of rony

by rony

World Leaders to Continue Efforts to Prevent Nuclear Terrorism

March 27, 2012 in 2012, America, High Alert on 9/11, Middle East, Nuclear, Obama, Security, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

Leaders of more than 50 nations have reaffirmed their commitment to reducing the world’s stockpiles of nuclear weapons.

U.S. President Barack Obama told attendees at the start of Tuesday’s final session of the two-day Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul that the international community must make “a serious and sustained effort” to reduce the world’s stockpiles of nuclear weapons.

“There are still too many bad actors in search of these dangerous materials, and these dangerous materials are still vulnerable in too many places. It would not take much, just a handful or so of these materials to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people, and that’s not an exaggeration, that’s the reality that we face.”

Mr. Obama acknowledged the progress that has been made since he hosted the 2010 summit in Washington, and noted that the number of nations participating this year has grown to more than 50.

He said the result will be a “larger global architecture” that will also allow the international community to “safely and effectively” pursue the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

But a statement issued Tuesday at the end of the summit offered no substantial plan for achieving that goal. Martine Letts, a high-ranking official at a Australian research center tells VOA the forum in Seoul is just one small part of what she calls a “a broad enterprise” in securing nuclear material.

“Summits are great in declaring lofty ideals…obviously the devil lies in the details. In particular, the capacity of nations to control such material within their borders. And there are many nations which have nuclear material, not just the known nuclear weapons states, where the security of that material is an issue of considerable concern. So declarations aside, what is important is to make sure those countries have the capacity and the political will and the governance arrangements to control those materials.”

The summit has been overshadowed by North Korea’s recent announcement that it will launch a satellite next month. Many Western nations believe the launch is actually a test of a long-range missile.

Shortly after arriving in South Korea, Mr. Obama warned Pyongyang the launch would jeopardize the recent agreement in which the U.S. would provide the regime food in exchange for the North freezing its nuclear program. North Korea issued a statement Tuesday saying it would go ahead with the rocket launch, and called the U.S. president’s remarks “confrontational.”

In his opening remarks at Tuesday’s opening session, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda said North Korea would be violating United Nations Security Council resolutions if it went ahead with the launch.

Letts says the isolated regime used the satellite launch to hijack the nuclear summit and its stated agenda. But Ben Rhodes, Mr. Obama’s deputy national security advisor, insisted during a press conference that North Korea has not been the summit’s central focus.

“What this is about is preventing an act of nuclear terrorism, and in the aftermath of September 11th, you’ll recall that the great concern of policymakers in Washington and around the world was the potential for terrorist groups like al Qaida to obtain a nuclear device and explode it in an American city. And they’d expressed their interest in doing that, and we also knew that there was significant amounts of nuclear material that was not adequately secured around the world, and that there were smuggling networks that could potentially be exploited as well, for terrorist groups to obtain this material.”

The United States and leading European suppliers of medical isotopes — Belgium, France, and the Netherlands — announced Monday they will move away from the use of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) to a less potent form of the material.

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu says the four-nation deal reduces the chance of the material falling into the wrong hands.

“Each reactor may look small but when you look at the plutonium being shipped and secured, the amount of highly enriched uranium being secured, now nearly 200 research reactors slowly being converted to this. This is something which I would not characterize this as small stuff.”

The Fissile Materials Working Group, an international coalition of nuclear experts, says the agreement marks an important step forward towards securing the global stockpile of nuclear materials, but insists bolder action is needed.

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Two British NATO troops killed in attack by shooter wearing Afghan army uniform

March 26, 2012 in 2012, America, Bomb, Explosive, Guns, Middle East, Military, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

KABUL — A gunman wearing an Afghan National Army uniform Monday turned his weapon against NATO troops in southern Afghanistan, killing two British soldiers.

“The individual who opened fire was killed when coalition forces returned fire,” the International Security Assistance Force said in a statement. “A joint Afghan and ISAF team is investigating the incident.”

An Afghan official and a Western security source later confirmed that both victims were British, AFP reported.

The Western source, who requested anonymity, added that an Afghan soldier was also shot dead, as well as the gunman, and another Briton was wounded.

The incident happened inside a base used by civilian and military personnel working in a provincial reconstruction team in Lashkar Gah, the main town in Helmand province, a senior Afghan official said.

The man approached the base from outside and there was allegedly an argument before the man opened fire, the official added.

Elsewhere, a suicide bomber blew himself Monday outside a US-run base in the Chora district of Uruzgan, also in southern Afghanistan, injuring three foreign troops and an Afghan police officer.

The attacks come in the wake of the shooting rampage by a US soldier in southern Kandahar province on March 11, which killed 17 people, including nine children.

Afghanistan’s Taliban insurgents vowed revenge against “sick-minded American savages.”

Days later, an Afghan man drove a stolen SUV toward a group of Marines at Camp Bastion in Helmand, where they were awaiting the arrival of the plane carrying US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Although no one was hurt in the incident, officials believe Panetta may have been in the assailant’s path if the SUV had reached the runway just a few minutes later.

Just weeks earlier the burning of Korans by American soldiers at a US detention facility north of Kabul prompted anti-American riots across the country, leaving some 30 protesters dead.

Six US troops were also killed in three separate attacks on American personnel by Afghan service members amid the unrest. Altogether, 13 foreign troops have been killed in so-called “green-on-blue” attacks this year.

In a separate incident, ISAF said one of its aircrafts made a “hard landing” Sunday in southern Afghanistan.

“ISAF is still in the process of assessing the circumstances to determine more facts; however, initial reporting indicates that there was no enemy activity in the area,” an ISAF statement said. “All personnel on the aircraft were recovered with no reported casualties.”

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Soldier’s Killing Spree Likely to Incite Violence

March 15, 2012 in 2012, America, Homeland Security, Iran, Islamic, Middle East, Military, Muslims, Radical Islam, Taliban, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

NATO’s International Security Assistance Force has confirmed that an American soldier recently turned himself in, and admitted to leaving his base in Afghanistan’s Kandahar province and went on a rampage from house to house in villages adjacent to his base, killing 16 Afghan people in their homes.

Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai immediately demanded an explanation from the United States, for the senseless killing of 16 people, including nine children and three women, while the Afghan parliament, demanded a public trial for the suspect, adding new tensions to a relationship that was already severely strained.

While the motive for this atrocity is unclear, there is speculation that the soldier, who had served three tours in Iraq and was on his first deployment in Afghanistan, might have suffered a mental breakdown. Regardless remember that extremists are masters of using major news events and controversies for recruiting, and as justification for their violent actions. After the incident the Taliban released a statement claiming that 50 people had been killed, calling U.S. forces “sick-minded American savages and they would mete out punishment for the “barbaric actions.” Analysts have long warned that the radical Islamist militia, regularly exaggerates casualty figures, a fact coupled with this appalling occurrence is likely to further inflame tensions in the area and beyond.

Be aware that this tragic incident comes on the heels of the killing of six NATO service-members by Afghans in response to the burning of Korans by American troops last month, potentially adding another chapter bloody story line again proving that radical Islam poses a challenge in the modern world, which is like that of no other radical religious movement. Despite the myriad terrorist plots executed and thwarted over the last few years, and the warped belief that there is a united Islamic movement hostile to everything we value, we must understand that most Muslims are not terrorist sympathizers, but recent events and history offer proof that there are radical Islamic elements within their ranks that pose a danger to our security, demanding vigilance, resources, and in some instances, military action. Remember that some time ago, the repercussions from a cartoon controversy led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence resulting in a total of more than 100 deaths, and setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran. In addition consider of the plight of Ayaan Hirsi Ali a 40-year-old Somali immigrant, former Muslim, survivor of child genital mutilation, and author of books critical of Islam. She now lives her life in constant fear due to multiple death threats.

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Iran Won’t Respond to Anything but Lethal Force

March 9, 2012 in 2012, America, Iran, Middle East, Military, Obama, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

I just got back from AIPAC, and felt that the official statements by the US President fell way short of the mark. No hardened Iranian leader with blood on his hands is going to have sleepless night because the President says “everything is on the table” but give sanctions a chance. We know how effective sanctions are in regime change – we need only look at Cuba. 
Make no mistake that a nuclear powered Iran is a US problem and threatens all our interests in the Middle East and of course it also threatens Israel. With a nuclear alternative their proxies could place a small nuclear device in a US City and we would have no deterrent. They are also playing now with ICBM’s. 
Khameni and Ajmadinajad understand the use of force very well. The only time that Iran has ceased its  territorial ambitions was after the Vincennes incident in 1988 when the then Iranian regime was convinced that the Iranian airliner had been downed on purpose and that the US was getting into the war on the side of their ally at the time, Iraq. Two weeks after, the Iranians capitulated and the war was over. 
War is never convenient but sitting by and doing nothing is even more costly. History has shown us this at Munich when Chamberlain said he had peace in our time. He could have easily defeated Hitler at that point. Anyone doubts their ability to attack us should look at what is going on in Iran and their ally Syria to see what they do to their own people. 

This is a great forum and a privilege to read your views.

By: Henry Morgenstern

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

‘KONY 2012′ campaign goes viral across World Wide Web

March 8, 2012 in Military, Security, Uncategorized, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

If you’ve been on Twitter or Facebook in the last few days, you’ve probably seen the references to “KONY 2012.”

It’s all part of a viral meme by a group calledInvisible Children, calling for the capture of Joseph Kony, an elusive Ugandan warlord known to kidnap children to fight for his Lord’s Resistance Army.

The movement intends to target 20 celebrities (George Clooney, Angelina Jolie, Oprah among them) and a dozen policymakers to keep U.S. advisers in Africa and to help the Uganda government find Kony.

The group solicits donations, and offers an “action kit” with a unique bracelet and other supplies geared for the big, “Cover the Night” event on April 20. At sundown, activists are to gather “on every street corner in every city” and blanket areas with campaign literature.

The group’s goal “aims to make Joseph Kony famous, not to celebrate him, but to raise support for his arrest and set a precedent for international justice.”

And a big part of that campaign is a 30-minute online movie narrated by Jason Russell.

Russell talks about meeting a boy named Jacob in Uganda in 2003. And Russell attempts to explain the Lord’s Resistance Army and Kony to a worldwide online audience, and to his young son, Gavin.

Then he introduces the meat of the movie with this message: “The next 27 minutes are an experiment. But in order for it to work, you have to pay attention.” Here it is:

Click Here to View Video

Since posted March 5, the film has drawn around 10 million views, with about 680,000 “likes” and 17,000 “dislikes” on YouTube as of Wednesday evening.

The movement does have detractors.

Jezebel.com, for example, warns readers to “think twice” before donating to the cause, citing “dubious finances,” exaggerated claims, support for military action, marketing tactics, and recommends donating to other groups, such as Doctors Without Borders.

A Google search shows other reports, both pro and con, on the issue.

Posted By: Laura Weisman ( Email )

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Top Lawmakers Mull Syrian Options

March 7, 2012 in Al Qaeda, America, Bio Terror, Bomb, Explosive, Guns, Middle East, Military, Muslims, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

An estimated 7,500 Syrians have been killed by President Bashar Assad’s military during the past year, a fact that has led Senator John McCain (R-AZ) to call for U.S.-led air strikes to stop the slaughter of unarmed civilians being carried out by the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, saying: “Providing military assistance to the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups is necessary, but at this late hour, that alone will not be sufficient to stop the slaughter and save innocent lives.” Senators Joseph Lieberman (I-CT), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC.), followed by issuing a statement backing the Arizona Senator’s position on Syria.

Before risking a single American soldier’s life in Syria, the first question we should ask when it comes to using our military is, “Is it in America’s interest? And secondly what is the risk and what is to be gained by such actions?

 Speaking on the subject before a Senate panel recently Marine General James Mattis, head of U.S. Central Command, warned of the potential threats from the deteriorating situation in Syria. The General warned that President Bashar Assad’s regime has a “substantial” chemical and biological weapons capability and thousands of shoulder-launched missiles.

Remember what happened not long ago, when Libya fell, much of their stockpile of portable anti-aircraft missiles went missing and are believed to have crossed borders. The stash of Russian-made Grinch SA-24 and SA-7 surface-to-air missiles were reported missing along with mortars and artillery rounds from a Tripoli weapons warehouse. Experts say the shoulder-launched weapons, which can fit in the trunk of a car, can take down a commercial jet. Since 1975, similar weapons have been used in attacks on at least 40 aircraft, causing 28 crashes and more than 800 deaths.

Assad has continually said his country was clearly being targeted by outside forces seeking to undermine his regime, blaming the one-year revolt threatening his regime on what he calls, foreign-backed “terrorist gangs.” He might be at least partially right. According to an Iraqi intelligence official al-Qaeda-linked fighters have been flowing from Iraq to Syria, and the groups leader, Ayman al-Zawahri has called on Muslims in Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey to join the uprising against Assad’s regime. Consider that potential if a non-state terrorist group(s) like al-Qaeda was able to secure Syria’s cache of chemical and bio-weapons in the midst of chaos and an apparent lack of security or custody of these weapons.

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Holder defends killing of terrorist US citizens

March 6, 2012 in America, Homeland Security, Law Enforcement / Terrorism, Middle East, Military, Security, Terrorism, war

Share

www.homelandsecuritynet.com

WASHINGTON — The United States has the legal right to kill US citizens abroad if they are senior terror leaders presenting an “imminent” threat to the country, Attorney General Eric Holder argued yesterday.

Holder laid out the conditions for such targeted killings — which he insisted were not assassinations — in a speech at Northwestern University Law School.

The speech marked the most vigorous defense by the administration of the practice since al Qaeda thug Anwar al-Awlaki, a US citizen, was killed in Yemen by a drone strike last year along with Samir Khan, an American citizen born in Pakistan.

“Some have called such operations ‘assassinations.’ They are not, and the use of that loaded term is misplaced,” Holder said, arguing that use of lethal force “in self-defense against a leader of al Qaeda” wouldn’t violate the existing ban on assassinations.

He laid out three conditions that an attack on a citizen who was a terror leader plotting against Americans would have to meet: It comes after a “careful review,” and the person poses an “imminent threat of violent attack,” capture is “not feasible,” and the operation is conducted in accordance with the “law of war principles.”

“The unfortunate reality is that our nation will likely continue to face terrorist threats that, at times, originate with our own citizens,” Holder said. “When such individuals take up arms against this country and join al Qaeda in plotting attacks designed to kill their fellow Americans, there may be only one realistic and appropriate response.”

Holder cited the US killing of Adm. Isoroku Yamamoto, who commanded the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, as a precedent within “law of war principles.”

“Disrupting and preventing [terror] plots — and using every available and appropriate tool to keep the American people safe — has been, and will remain, this administration’s top priority,” he said.

By GEOFF EARLE

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

Officials Hope Friday Prayers Do Not Include More Koran Burning Backlash

February 24, 2012 in America, Islamic, Middle East, Military, Muslims, Pakistan, Taliban, war

Share

On its site shahamat-english.com, the Taliban had urged Afghan security forces to “turn their guns on the foreign infidel invaders.” It seems to be working, in an apparent backlash over the recent burning of Korans at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan, an Afghan solider turned his gun on his allies, shooting and killing two U.S. troops and injured four others.

The attack occurred the eastern Ningarhar province, along the border with Pakistan, but was not the only violence that resulted from the accidental destruction of Islamic religious material. There were many bloody protests over the incident.

In addition Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai who had earlier said a U.S. officer “ignorantly” burned copies of the Koran, now wants NATO to put on public trial those who burned copies of the Koran, and publically punish the perpetrators.

Consider that there have been numerous violent anti-U.S. protests in Afghanistan, since US military personnel accidentally “improperly disposed” of religious materials, including Koran’s (Muslim holy books), at Bagram airfield, but security officials are deeply concerned what may occur after Friday prayers, because Friday is the holy day in the Muslim week, a day that protests are typically much larger. This is because thousands of Muslim faithful gather at Mosques and as the men flood out of mosques they often converge in cities and towns in protest.

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

US soldiers train for agricultural mission in Afghanistan

February 9, 2012 in 2012, America, war

Share

By Claudia Cowan

Before they’re deployed to help stabilize Afghanistan, hundreds of U.S. Army troops, Marines, and other government personnel head to Fresno, Calif., for a crash course on that war-torn country’s most vital industry: agriculture.

The program is called ADAPT: The Agricultural Development for the Afghanistan Pre-deployment Training. It’s funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and home base is Fresno State University in the heart of California’s fertile Central Valley.

The program’s leaders say the hands-on training, and literally getting to the root of things, is critical to winning the war on terror.

“Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries on our Earth,” Paul Sommers, ADAPT’s project director said. “The food insecurity situation is chronic there. If we can get them a little bit more secure with their food supply, get them through that hungry season just a little bit better, that means they’re on the road to stability, and growth.”

Fresno provides the same climate and many of the same fruits, nuts and vegetables, these civil affairs specialists will see when they get to Afghanistan. In the span of a week, they learn the basics — from planting and soil, to irrigation. These are among the key agricultural issues that face 80 percent of all Afghan citizens.

The troops say that while combat has its place, lasting economic security starts with the shovel.

“If they’ve gained in their farm production, [the local residents] are not as desperate to join into other operations that are against the United States,” Capt. Harold Price, a civil affairs specialist with the US Army Reserve, said.

These units also will be able to link extremely poor farmers with the latest technology, through a special app. that works on smartphones and tablets, called “e-Afghan Ag.” The online resource connects to agriculture experts in the U.S. and in Afghanistan, who can provide information, feedback, and possible solutions.

Jarrod Mattison, a sergeant with Army Reserves, says e Afghan Ag can help him diagnose a tree, or even a chicken, that doesn’t look quite right.

“And if it’s not in the application,” Mattison said, “there’s this awesome reach-back function where I can take a picture of that chicken, and send it back to these guys at the USDA, these guys at Fresno State. In 12 to 24 hours, they get me an exact answer as to what’s wrong with this chicken, and what I can do to help.”

This is all part of America’s evolving mission in Afghanistan: helping a transitional government secure agricultural sustainability, and economic security, through outreach, technology and seeds of hope.

Read more: http://homelandsecuritynet.com/network-log-in/network.html

Share
Avatar of rony

by rony

U.S.: Humanitarian aid to Syria not likely soon

February 9, 2012 in 2012, America, Security, war

Share

By Jamie Crawford

As the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad continues its relentless assault on the city of Homs, the United States says it is still too soon to determine how a humanitarian aid package could be effectively delivered to those who need it.

“We’re not prepared to speak about what the delivery options might be,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Wednesday at a daily briefing with reporters. “We have quite a bit of work to do with other governments, so I’m not going to speculate.”

After a Russian and Chinese veto of a United Nations resolution aimed at stabilizing the situation in Syria, the United States is working to create a mechanism, possibly outside the U.N. Security Council, that could best serve besieged areas of Syria.

One such option would be a “Friends of Syria” contact group of U.S. allies and partners who support a free and democratic Syria, Nuland said. The group would support the Arab League plan on Syria that served as the basis for the failed U.N. resolution.

A meeting “may be held in the near future,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said at a White House briefing on Wednesday. For now, the United States is pursuing a “political solution” while considering humanitarian assistance.

While the United States is not ruling out providing humanitarian aid unilaterally, “we’re working with our partners,” Carney said.

But before any discussion begins on what kind of aid may be extended, the United States is consulting with individual countries about what such a group could do, who would join, who would be eligible for aid, and even where the group would meet.

“We on the U.S. side have already been looking at what we can do to prepare ourselves on both the financial and legal side(s) so that we’re ready to provide humanitarian aid, such as food and medicine,” Nuland said. “But we’re going to have to work with our international partners, we’re going to have to work with neighboring states to identify coordinators on the ground who could assist in receiving this aid and in distributing it.”

Sen. John McCain of Arizona said more needs to be considered. McCain has been vocal in calling for the Syrian rebels to be given more arms. In an interview to air Thursday on CNN’s “John King, USA,” the Republican senator said “peaceful means” have been exhausted, and other options need to be considered.

“We could do things by providing them with intelligence information, with satellite information, with information on the movements of the Syrian armed forces,” McCain insisted in the interview, adding that the United States and allies could provide medical help as well as work with Turkey to provide refuge for fleeing Syrians.

Some longtime Syria watchers say that so long as the Assad regime continues its attacks, getting humanitarian aid to those who need it most will be difficult.

Delivering aid is “virtually impossible without the consent of the Syrian government or a formidable armed military from outside coming in to safeguard any convoys of the like,” Ted Kattouf, a former U.S. ambassador to Syria, told CNN.

Assad is “going to try and do everything in his power to bring the fighting to an end through sheer force, and so, no, I don’t see any humanitarian aid getting in at this point,” Kattouf said.

And with Syria’s more heterogeneous and mixed population centers, establishing a safe haven, like the city of Benghazi during the Libyan uprising, is extremely difficult.

While there have been instances in the past where humanitarian assistance was sent into hostile areas by land, sea or air, nothing appears to be imminent.

“Frankly, we are not at the stage of ventilating options,” Nuland said while being careful not to define the mission of any group before its creation.

The group would also look at how its members could tighten sanctions against the Assad regime to their fullest extent, Nuland said.

Turkey, which has been harsh in its criticism of the Assad regime, has offered to host a meeting of a Syrian contact group if it is formed. That is likely to be part of a larger discussion on Syria next week when the Turkish foreign minister meets with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Washington.

Share